Danish ships must sail on green, Danish electricity

Comment brought in Berlingske on 17 October 2021 by Claus Ekman, director of the Green Transition Denmark and Knud Erik Andersen, managing director of European Energy

There is a need for an aggressive expansion of green power production in Denmark, so that the planes and ships of the future are fueled by Danish solar cells and wind turbines. The Danish politicians should focus on energy independence and not repeat the fad about importing biomass energy from abroad.

It can be difficult not to get your arms down over the many announcements about green initiatives, which in these weeks and months fill Danish and international newspaper front pages. Most recently, the Danish shipping giant Maersk has announced that it will begin the transition to sailing on green fuels from 2023.

This is positive, but also strictly necessary in light of the latest IPCC report, which more clearly than ever records a gloomy future scenario of the world that our children and grandchildren will have to live in. Also because, historically, shipping and air traffic in particular have have been the two sectors which have escaped actual climate targets in the international climate negotiations and have therefore lagged behind enormously. The Danish footprint on global greenhouse gas emissions may seem limited, but if we look at the amount of energy consumed in our international transport, there is a significant task in restructuring the sectors, including obtaining enough green fuels to fuel the ships and planes in the future , which sails under the Danish flag.

Therefore, Denmark has a special responsibility to ensure that the green electricity, which must be used to drive the Danish part of international transport forward, is generated by electricity from wind turbines and solar cells at home. If Denmark is to deliver on the climate target of a 70 percent CO 2 reduction and find green energy to also power some of our ships and planes, it will require a doubling of renewable energy from wind and solar in 2030 compared to what for which today there is security.

There is no doubt that we in Denmark have the right wind and solar resources to give other countries' energy dreams a back wheel. But at the moment it is more likely that we are looking at a slowdown in the production of green electricity rather than the necessary expansion that can make us the green energy champions of the future.

Before the summer holidays, a political agreement effectively shut down the otherwise so-called "open-door scheme", which was supposed to support the expansion of coastal offshore wind in particular. And both the next big offshore wind farm Hesselø and the government's high-profile energy islands have since run into technical challenges. Unfortunately, there is plenty of bad news about the starting point for the green transition, namely green electricity.

Now it is time for the politicians to sit down and create the right conditions for producers of green electricity. The focus should also be on how we in Denmark do not just ensure enough power to electrify our society, but how we procure enough power from here at home to be able to adapt ship and air transport in the greenest way. In this way, we can ensure that we do it right from the start and not, as with biomass, throw ourselves into solutions that look green, but which potentially harm the climate fight and the climate more than they benefit.

By |2021-10-18T10:50:24+01:0017. October 2021|Comment|0 Comments

Comments on the agreement on 'Environmental initiatives in green cities and a developing capital'

We are very pleased with the proposal for air partnerships with a focus on extending environmental zones to several cities and opportunities for further limiting pollution from wood-burning stoves. It is a partnership we would very much like to participate in. Because there is an urgent need for further tightening beyond what the government is proposing. 

It is positive that the government will finally let the country's five largest cities introduce environmental zones with filter requirements for the oldest diesel cars, just like in other European cities. This is something the Green Transition Denmark has been calling for for the past 20 years. However, we would have liked to see all Danish cities given the option of similar environmental zones. 

On the other hand, we are certainly not impressed by the fact that you simply want to ban wood-burning stoves from before 2008. Burning just one kg of wood in a wood-burning stove from 2009 pollutes approx. 1.000.000 m3 completely clean air to above the World Health Organization's new particle limit value. There is all the air that covers 100.000 m2 and to a height of 10 m. It is frightening that such extreme pollution should be allowed in urban residential areas. At the same time, new wood-burning stoves emit significantly more of the particularly health- and climate-damaging soot particles than older wood-burning stoves, and thereby contribute significantly more to global warming than older wood-burning stoves.   

Quotes

"It is good that zero-emission zones are allowed in the central districts, but unfortunately there are many exceptions that dilute the zero-emission zones. Likewise, we would have liked to see significantly larger zero-emission zones in the larger cities,” says Jeppe Juul, senior adviser at the Green Transition Denmark.

"It is good – but also very late – that the government is introducing filter requirements for the most polluting diesel cars in our biggest cities. Many human lives and very serious illness could have been saved if the politicians had introduced the filter requirement 10 years ago, like other cities in Europe,” highlights Kåre Press-Kristensen, senior adviser at the Green Transition Denmark.  

"New wood-burning stoves pollute heavily and contribute to serious health damage and global warming. The right thing is therefore to completely ban heating with solid fuel (firewood, coal, etc.) as part of the green transition. First in the cities – later nationwide,” says Kåre Press-Kristensen, senior adviser at the Green Transition Denmark.  

"The agreement envisages that many public areas will be free of pesticides. But why not all areas? Nature is under pressure, not least biodiversity. Where exactly is it that wild flowers and a rich insect life are inappropriate? The initiative is certainly a step in the right direction, but a completely broad ban is needed,” says Lone Mikkelsen, senior advisor at the Green Transition Denmark.  

By |2021-09-14T15:25:19+01:0014. September 2021|Comment|0 Comments

Use agricultural funds to ensure the green transition

Comment brought in Berlingske on April 16 by Claus Ekman, director of the Green Transition Denmark, Britta Riis, director of Dyrenes Beskyttelse, Lars Midtiby, director of the Danish Nature Conservation Association and Mads Reinholdt, director of the Consumer Council Tænk

It puts pressure on nature, the environment, climate, biodiversity and animal welfare.

Food production plays a decisive role in achieving Denmark's objectives for climate and biodiversity. Agriculture uses over 60 percent of the Danish area for production. Approximately 80 percent of that area is used to produce animal feed, and agriculture accounts for 22,4 percent of Denmark's CO2e emissions, according to Aarhus University.

The funds from the agricultural funds are primarily channeled to projects that aim to continue the current type of production. And it is, among other things, thanks to the funds from these funds that the development of Danish agriculture has continued in the wrong direction for far too many years.

The Alcohol Tax Fund for Agriculture has targeted several of the fund's funds for climate measures, but we lack the fundamental change in the funds that is necessary to ensure a sustainable food sector. We need answers on how society's interests can be better served in the funds, and answers on how the funds can help to ensure greater production of plant-based food.

We therefore believe that the funds should be reconsidered.

The 14 agricultural funds today invest in everything from potatoes and horticulture to pigs and cattle. In recent years, several of the agricultural funds have been in the media's spotlight for a number of scandalous cases, which ended in serious criticism from the National Audit Office. Some of the criticism has been met, but despite positive measures, there have still been no fundamental changes to the structures of the funds.

Denmark is thus missing an obvious opportunity to accelerate the development of agriculture in a greener direction through a modernization of the agricultural funds. We have three proposals to do something about it.

Proposal 1: Better management of funds

The foundations draw up a strategy every four years. These strategies should be supplemented with one-year action plans that are approved directly by the Minister of Food. The action plans must reflect the strategic objectives and create increased transparency for the award criteria for the applicants for the annual distribution of funds from the funds. The Minister of Food should also ensure that min. 80 percent of the funds will be used for the benefit of the green transition.

Proposal 2: Wider representation

The majority of the foundations' boards today consist of members appointed by the profession.

In addition, a minority of members are appointed to look after wider community interests. These are currently appointed by the Consumer Council Tænk, the Labor Movement's Business Council and Denmark's Free Research Foundation. This designated right should be expanded with Animal Protection and Denmark's Nature Conservation Association.

An equal representation of the interests of the profession and society should be ensured in all of the foundations' boards – six of each in the larger foundations – next to which the Minister of Food should appoint an independent chairman.

Proposal 3: Independent administration

The funds are currently administered by the industry organizations themselves. In order to ensure independence, an independent secretariat should be established as a self-governing unit, financed by the funds, with the sole task of administering the funds.

This must emphasize the foundations' independence and focus on allocating funds to projects that benefit both the profession and society.

Greener investments

The funds can play an important role in ensuring the green transition and the objectives of a 70 percent CO2e reduction by 2030 and CO2e neutrality in 2050.

But it requires changes in the structure which helps to maintain the existing agriculture. The interests of society must play a greater role, and the agricultural funds should therefore be modernized so that there is a broad societal anchoring in the development work.

By |2021-04-16T09:14:25+01:0016. April 2021|Comment|0 Comments
Go to Top